|     McCann   v.   The
        Queen,   1975 -- The "Cruel and Unusual Punishment" Case     At the core of   Prisoners of Isolation  
        were the experiences of a group of prisoners who, in 1974, had asked for
        my help in challenging the conditions of their solitary confinement in
        the notorious "Penthouse" of the B.C. Penitentiary; they had been detained
        there in some cases for years at a time. That challenge took the form
        of a Statement of Claim filed in the Federal Court of Canada in the name
        of Jack McCann and six other plaintiffs (filed June 4, 1974; No. T-2343-74).
        It asserted that the conditions of their confinement in "administrative
        segregation" constituted cruel and unusual treatment or punishment under
        section 2(b) of the     Canadian Bill of Rights    
        (R.S.C. 1960, c.144), and that their solitary confinement, without notice
        of any charges laid against them and without a hearing before an impartial
        decision-maker, deprived them of their right to a fair hearing in accordance
        with the principles of fundamental justice, guaranteed to them under sections
        1(a) and 2(e) of the   Bill of Rights.  
           The conditions in the "Penthouse" were appalling:
         
 
  The cells measured 11 feet by 6½ feet and consisted of three solid concrete
        walls and a solid steel door with a 5-inch-square window which could only
        be opened from outside the cell. Inside the cell, there was no proper
        bed. The prisoners slept on a cement slab four inches off the floor; the
        slab was covered by a sheet of plywood upon which was laid a four-inch-thick
        foam pad. Prisoners were provided with blankets, sheets and a foam-rubber
        pillow. About 2 feet from the end of the sleeping platform against the
        back wall was a combination toilet and wash-basin. An institutional rule
        required that the prisoner sleep with his head away from the door and
        next to the toilet bowl to facilitate inspection of the prisoners by the
        guards. Failure to comply with this rule would result in guards throwing
        water on the bedding or kicking the cell door. There were no other furnishings
        in the cell. One of the expert witnesses described the physical space
        as "one step above a strip cell . . . a concrete vault in which people
        are buried."  
 The cell was illuminated by a light that burned 24 hours a day. The 100-watt
        bulb was dimmed to 25 watts at night. The light was too bright to permit
        comfortable sleep and too dim to provide adequate illumination . . . Prisoners
        only had cold water in their cells. Twice a week they were given a cup
        of what was supposed to be hot water for shaving but which, they testified,
        was usually lukewarm. They were not permitted to have their own razors,
        and one razor was shared among all the prisoners on the tier . . .
 
 The prisoners were confined in their concrete vaults for 23½ hours a day.
        They were allowed out of their cells briefly to pick up their meals from
        the tray at the entrance to the tier and for exercise. That exercise was
        limited to walking up and down the 75-foot corridor in front of their
        cells. Exercise was taken under the continuous supervision of an armed
        guard who patrolled on the elevated catwalk. For the rest of the day prisoners
        were locked up in their cells.
 
 Prisoners spoke to visitors through a screen and conversations were monitored
        by the staff. Standard procedure governing the movement of prisoners from
        the unit to the visiting area decreed that they be handcuffed to a restraining
        belt around their waist and that leg-irons be placed on them. Upon returning
        from the visit, prisoners were subjected to skin-frisks, even though they
        may never have left the sight of the escorting officer or had any physical
        contact with their visitors. (Jackson,   Prisoners
        of Isolation  at 48-49)
   Harsh as they were, it was not just the physical conditions in the solitary
        confinement unit that constituted the principle basis for pain and suffering.
        The prisoner, upon climbing the stairs to the unit and entering the doors
        that isolated it from the rest of the prison, both literally and symbolically
        entered a different world. In the Penthouse, the worst things about prison
        -- the humiliation and degradation, the frustration, the despair, the
        loneliness, and the deep sense of antagonism between prisoners and guards
        -- were intensified. In my interviews with prisoners, and in their testimony
        before the court, they talked about how that antagonism often reached
        the point of gratuitous cruelty. Jack McCann testified that after a prisoner
        in solitary had slashed himself, an officer offered him (Mr. McCann) a
        razor blade so he, too, could "slash up." Evidence was given of mentally
        unstable prisoners being goaded by guards and beaten when they reacted.
        Even medical treatment became disguised punishment. In one incident, a
        prisoner who had refused oral medication from a hospital officer and would
        not allow himself to be injected was tear-gassed so that the medication
        could be administered. Tear-gassings were a ritualistic part of the regime,
        and even prisoners not primarily targetted suffered ill effects and received
        no subsequent change of clothing or bedding. Page 1 of 3
           |