|   Springhill -- Twisting and Torquing the Spirit and the
        Law     At Springhill the Task Force met with both the Inmate Committee and
        the Native Brotherhood. The primary complaint of the Inmate Committee
        was the way in which the CSC Drug Strategy was being implemented at Springhill.
        The Task Force was told that where a prisoner gave a "hot" urine sample
        he would immediately have his open visits or private family visits suspended
        and be placed on screened visits. This was a general policy and occurred
        without any personal hearing before the Visit Review Board. I advised
        the Committee that this was not authorised by law in so far as the suspension
        of visiting rights has to be related to a security or safety concern which
        has a rational connection to the visiting rights. Only if the institution
        can reasonably believe that the prisoner’s drug use relates to his getting
        access to drugs through his visitor can a suspension of his visiting rights
        be justified. (The relationship between the drug strategy and visiting
        rights is the subject of a more detailed examination in Sector 5, Chapter 3). The
        zero tolerance practises at Springhill also had an impact on segregation
        policies. Prisoners charged with being under the influence of an intoxicant,
        as the result of a hot test, were often segregated. Since loss of a single
        cell was the normal result of being placed in segregation, this meant
        that a prisoner charged with an offence and segregated, even if found
        not guilty at the court hearing, would still be prejudiced as a result
        of his initial segregation, because when released back to the population
        he would be required to double-bunk.
          After meeting with the Inmate Committee the Task Force met with the
        Native Brotherhood. The clear message the Brotherhood gave was that at
        Springhill Institution Aboriginal prisoners were treated as second or
        third class citizens and that there was no respect for Aboriginal spirituality
        or Aboriginal Elders. One Brotherhood member reported that he has been
        in segregation three times in the last year, the longest period being
        eight months. He was not allowed to have his medicine bundle nor have
        access to sweetgrass and did not see the Elder in all that time. Not having
        access to an Elder had been particularly difficult for him.
          We look on the Elder differently from the way a non-Aboriginal
        prisoner looks on the chaplain. For us the Elder is not just a priest,
        he is more like our brother. For a native person not to have access to
        and guidance from the Elder, particularly when you are in segregation,
        is a greater deprivation because the Elder is of such significance in
        our lives.     Earlier in the day Dan Kane, when giving his initial briefing to the
        warden and staff, he had made the point that the accusation directed against
        the CSC by Madam Justice Arbour that the CSC did not respect the law was
        one that "twists and torques the spirit." The Inmate Committee and the
        Native Brotherhood left the Task Force in little doubt that the way in
        which the CSC had implemented the Drug Strategy at Springhill and interpreted
        the provisions of the   CCRA   regarding Aboriginal
        spirituality, in their view, "twisted and torqued both the spirit and
        the letter of the law." Page 1 of 1
           |