|   Wednesday, September 1 -- The Disciplinary Court Convenes
          On Wednesday, September 1, 1993, the weekly session of the Matsqui disciplinary
        court convened. The court, presided over by the Independent Chairperson,
        Mr. Keith Routley, has the mandate under the   CCRA  
        of adjudicating disciplinary charges designated as 'serious'. Charges
        designated 'minor' are adjudicated by correctional supervisors who have
        more restricted powers of punishment than the Independent Chairperson
        and, in particular, cannot impose a sentence of segregation. On the court's
        docket were two prisoners who had been held in segregation, in the first
        case, for comments made following the assault on Mike Boileau and in the
        second case for alleged threats made during Operation Big Scoop. Mr. Badari
        was charged with threatening to assault an officer. Officer Morton gave
        evidence that Mr. Badari was told to lock up for the 4:00 p.m. count.
        As Mr. Morton was going down the ranges Mr. Badari attempted to walk by
        him to get some water from the washroom. Mr. Morton told him he could
        not do this, it was time to lock up and ordered him to go back to his
        cell. Mr. Badari went into his cell but Mr. Morton heard him say through
        the open door, "Maybe you need a punch in the fucking head, too." Mr.
        Morton then closed the door and continued to go down the range. He was
        questioned by Mr. Routley, as to where exactly Mr. Badari was at the time
        he made this statement. Officer Morton replied that he was inside the
        cell with the door partly open. In response to further questioning, he
        said that Mr. Badari did not make any overt physical move. Mr. Morton
        was also asked whether he felt threatened by Mr. Badari's statement and
        his response was that coming so soon after the Boileau incident he did
        take it personally. Mr. Routley ruled that he was not satisfied that the
        actions alleged against Mr. Badari constituted a serious enough breach
        of security to justify being designated a serious charge and referred
        the matter to minor court.
          Of the four prisoners who were alleged to have made derogatory remarks
        in the aftermath of the Boileau assault, Mr. Badari was the only prisoner
        who remained in segregation. The three other prisoners had been released
        a week previously. Significantly, his was the only case in which serious
        allegations had been made against a staff member of using excessive force
        -- by smashing him against a barrier while his hands were handcuffed behind
        his back. Mr. Routley had now determined that the allegations against
        Mr. Badari merited no more than a minor court charge which, even if Mr.
        Badari were found guilty, did not permit a sentence of segregation. However,
        at the time of Mr. Routley's determination, Mr. Badari had already spent
        nine days in segregation.
          Mr. Hurst was the prisoner taken up to segregation at the start of Operation
        Big Scoop for making threatening statements in the living unit. The charge
        he faced was creating or participating in a disturbance likely to jeopardize
        the security of the institution. The charging officer gave evidence that
        while the institution was locked down that Friday morning, he had gone
        onto Mr. Hurst's tier to give two diabetic prisoners their special meal.
        Mr. Hurst was out of his cell but was separated by a barrier from the
        officer. He stated in a loud voice, "You fucking better have good reason
        for this or there's going to be some retaliation." The officer said that
        he did not feel this was directed at him personally but he did report
        it to the keeper on the first floor. A little while later Mr. Hurst was
        observed standing at the end of the range and the officer overhead him
        saying to other prisoners, "If they don't serve breakfast soon, I'm going
        to start kicking heads." The officer said that this again was not directed
        to him and he was not even sure that Mr. Hurst knew he was there. Again,
        he reported this to the keeper and a little while later six or seven officers
        came up, went down to Mr. Hurst's cell and took him to segregation. Bud
        Alcock, who was sitting as the institutional advisor to the court, then
        explained to Mr. Routley the context of what had happened; a decision
        had been made to segregate a number of prisoners and, because of the volatile
        situation, instructions had been given that anyone who "vocalized" during
        the operation should be segregated.
          Mr. Routley concluded that "talk about kicking heads was not exactly
        pouring oil on troubled waters" and he was satisfied that Mr. Hurst was
        guilty of the charge. However, since the prisoners were locked on the
        ranges, he did not view it as falling within the upper range of severity.
        He imposed a fine of $15 as the sentence. When Mr. Routley handed down
        his judgement, Mr. Hurst had already spent six days in segregation; although
        he had not been an original target in Operation Big Scoop, he had already
        spent two more days than nine of the prisoners who were the primary targets.
        Page 1 of 1
           |